Of all the phrases to be quoted from Isabel Diaz Ayuso In the only debate of the candidates for the Presidency of the Community of Madrid with her present, held on Telemadrid, there is a very significant one: “This is what debates have”. The PP candidate to renew her Presidency shrugged her shoulders while she pronounced the sentence and addressed her voters. What is it about the debates that bother Isabel Díaz Ayuso so much? The lack of control despite the rules.
Alberto Reyero: “The Ayuso Government feared that there would be legal problems due to the protocols in the residences”
Further
What the debates have that Isabel Díaz Ayuso does not like is the unpredictable. The unexpected is that part of life that is not programmed according to her own interests and that does not insist and repeat itself. Common mortals have learned to forcibly reconcile with all that she had not written in the script of her life, and she ends up making the unforeseen circumstances shine as best she can. Power consists of subtracting power from the unforeseen and that the script she writes is fulfilled to the letter.
When Alejandra Jacinto (Podemos) decided to break with the script, leave her box and move to the lectern where Isabel Díaz Ayuso was sheltered, with Juan Lobato (PSOE) in between, she broke the plan. Only the impertinent are capable of breaking the rule to clarify what is happening. According to the third meaning of the RAE Dictionary, the impertinent is a glass with a handle. In other words, the impertinent is used to see better. That is what Alejandra Jacinto did when she handed him the book written by Alberto Reyeroformer counselor for Social Policies in the Government of Díaz Ayuso, and titled They will die undignified (Books of the KO).
A television milestone
The title is a phrase that the former counselor used in an email, to warn those responsible for Health of what those protocols that the presidency of the Community of Madrid had approved would cause. The unpredictable in the Madrid Assembly has no place. That is why the PP, thanks to the votes of Vox, knocked down the commission of investigation of what is known as the “protocol of shame”. This is the issue that the leading book of the night deals with in the candidates’ debate and the only reason that has taken Isabel Díaz Ayuso out of the boxes that she intended to keep.
Even the director went into a tailspin and shot a reverse shot for a moment of the face of the driver, Víctor Arribas, before going back to click on what was happening on the set. The iconic moment of the evening discovered “what debates have” and what it takes to be a virtuoso of reflex action and eloquence. In a debate, the teleprompter is prohibited. Although cards are used in which the candidates have written down the slogans that they must repeat, if the rival has done his homework, he will try to tear up those papers to expose the opponent in the oratory arena. And reveal the limits of his persuasiveness.
Nerves, insecurities and discomfort at having to go through the trance of debate to convince their voters could get to him. And the fluorescent glow of the pink of her fantastic dress ended up dying when Reyero’s book appeared. That moment she revealed how the health protocols against COVID-19 are the only thing capable of making her vulnerable. “It is disrespectful to say that she was left to die,” she said indignantly as she tried to get rid of the wound that has made her bleed in public: the health.
Isabel Díaz Ayuso did not like Alejandra Jacinto’s gift at all. She first handed her book back to him and then she withdrew her farewell greeting at the end of the debate. “Even if she rejects the book, the truth will end up coming out,” Jacinto warned her. Nor should she have liked the blouse that the Podemos candidate showed in the final part of the meeting. She had the face of her brother Tomás de ella stamped on her, to whom Jacinto turned on several occasions to ask the president if it seemed ethical to her to hire your brother in the worst of the pandemic. A question that he caused to abandon paul married the party he led. That’s what debates have, questions that make you uncomfortable.
A majority for Ayuso
This quote about the debates leads to the next one from Isabel Díaz Ayuso on Tuesday night on Telemadrid: “I don’t want to depend on anyone.” This is the reason that she used to claim the massive vote in favor of her. She did not talk about policies or concrete plans, but about tradition, the avant-garde, life, freedom and property. The reason why the people of Madrid should vote for her is because she does not want to depend on anyone, although she vindicated the culture of effort over and over again.
“I do not want there to be problems, but it does not depend on me but on the central government.” “I have been blocked.” More quotes for the newspaper library that were defining the position of the PP candidate, which she revolved around a slogan: Pedro Sanchez, enemy of Madrid. Nor was he “alluded” to the policies against climate change and promised that he would make terraces with orchards -like Manuela Carmena- and would place “a plant on the balcony of the people of Madrid”, as a recipe to stop it.
Although Mónica García (Más Madrid) made him ugly that he wanted more ultra-rich and they wanted more pediatricians, public health did not play such a leading role as predicted. She gave way to housing, to work I say and to the “government with soul” that Mónica García claimed. Juan Lobato, temperate and tight like his suit, preferred to be willing to dialogue and dissolve into a profile that distinguished him from the tricky tone. Lobato prefers to send 24 letters to Isabel Díaz Ayuso, than to tell her about the bite of her brother Tomás de ella.
The PSOE candidate, far removed from the spirit displayed by Ángel Gabilondo two years ago in the previous debate, addressed the viewer directly to promise him education, respect, quality public services and playing in the Champion of the European regions. Rocío Monasterio and her circus also participated in the debate, representing Vox.
