The 46-year-old woman allegedly killed by her ex-partner in Adeje (Tenerife) resigned from requesting a protection order or other criminal or civil actions and stated that the resignation was made “freely and voluntarily” without “any threat or coercion”, as stated this Tuesday, January 10, the Superior Court of Justice of the Canary Islands (TSJC).
The TSJC has provided this Tuesday details of what happened on December 30 when the woman murdered last Sunday night appeared at the Court of Violence against Women number 1 of Aronaafter having denounced his ex-partner for threats on December 28 at the post of the Civil Guard from Adeje.
In this regard, the TSJC has specified that, although it has been reported that the victim “did not testify” in court, the truth is that she did, although in the course of her presentation she availed herself of her right not to testify against his ex.
The woman stated that today investigated He was his sentimental partner, and he explained that this relationship had begun in 2013, when they both got married, and that as a result of this relationship they had two children.
He added that in 2019 they had divorced and that they had “resumed the relationship as roommates” in March 2020.
The woman availed herself of her right not to testify against the man now being investigated as the alleged perpetrator of her death “given her sentimental relationship” with him and when she was offered a request for a protection order, she stated that she was not interested in “adoption to any extent.”
Likewise, the judge offered her the possibility of taking criminal and civil actions and, according to the TSJC, the woman stated that she was resigning “as many as may correspond to her”, while stating that the resignation was made “freely and voluntarily” without – she declared —, “with any threat or coercion”.
Following this statement, the representative of the fiscal Ministery In the proceedings, he requested the provisional dismissal of the proceedings as he did not appreciate evidence that would allow the presumption of innocence of the defendant to be undermined, which the judicial authority agreed with the favorable report of the defense and the defendant’s attorney.
