SANTA CRUZ DE TENERIFE, July 5 (EUROPA PRESS) –
The Federation of Services to the Citizenship of Canary Islands Workers Commissions (FSC-CCOO Canarias) has reiterated this Wednesday to the Diputación del Común that, with a complete and not partial execution, it complies with the sentence against it of the Supreme Court that entails the preparation of the contract that corresponds to a worker as labor personnel, including in the payroll the labor complements that correspond to him and the seniority recognized by justice, since the three-year period continues without being paid to the worker who went to court and his claim was recognized .
In addition, he points out in a note, the Diputación del Común has not yet carried out the modification of the List of Job Positions (RPT) to accommodate the sentences that have condemned the institution and that, “supposedly, ensures fundamental rights and freedoms of Canarian society”.
The union indicates that the RPT must adjust to the fact that the advisers are not casual, but are labor technicians who perform eminently technical functions, as the courts have recognized in different sentences.
“We are facing a structural staff in the Common Council that has a contractual nature of a labor nature, despite the fact that the Common Council prevents it and is reluctant to assume said legally enshrined reality,” he points out.
In fact, it indicates that the Common Council is reluctant to accept that technical personnel have the right to participate in the stabilization process of Law 20/2021, of December 28, on urgent measures for the reduction in public employment.
For the union, “it is intolerable that the defender of the Canary Islands, Rafael Yanes, meets with different groups and unions to assess the precariousness of workers in the different public administrations and, nevertheless, hinders the practical implementation of the rights of the staff of the institution itself”.
In his opinion, “it is not accepted that an institution of these characteristics develops with practices typical of nineteenth-century caciquismo.”
FSC-CCOO already sent a letter to the institution dated November 7, 2022 and sent another on June 14 without receiving a response yet.
