The judge refuses to withdraw custody of the mother of Guima’s girlr, as requested by the little girl’s father. In addition, in the order of precautionary measures issued by the magistrate of the Court of First Instance and Instruction number 3 of Güímar, she acknowledges that the little girl has a return ticket to Tenerife for next August 12although it points out that from that moment and while the entire procedure lasts, The girl’s passport will be withdrawn and she is prohibited from leaving the Island.
In the document, also denies the processing of a European arrest warrantarguing on the one hand the existence of that passage and on the other that they have been able to verify “the good state of health, attention and care of the minor, who remains in the company of the mother and not in a situation of abandonment”.
Due to these circumstances, the magistrate considers that both will return to the Island and in fact assures that the mother has stated “her intention to hand over the minor to the father at the beginning of his vacation period in August”.
“There is no existence of an objective and real risk for the minor”, picks up the magistrate although she admits that “she has no communication with her father”. “Now, if the day comes, the minor is not reintegrated and returns to national territory, they could be interested again and these measures reviewed.”
In fact, the magistrate also considers that it is necessary “to avoid the situations that have been happening repeatedly, consisting of the father’s impossibility to pick up the minor in a peaceful manner and without altercations”, for which she orders that once that mother and daughter return to Tenerife, lThe deliveries and collections of the minor will be made at the Family Meeting Point of Santa Cruz de Tenerife, taking into account that “conflictive situations harm the well-being and psychological health of the minor”.
The father of the little girl decided last July file a complaint in the municipality of Güímar alleging that the mother did not deliver the little girl on July 16, as she assures that she was entitled to in the joint custody regulatory agreement. However, the mother has assured that “it was the father who did not want to take the minor.”
The woman, which the Civil Guard places in Switzerland, insists that it is “victim of c”an issue for which he denounced the father, although in the trials related to this case the crime has been denied and, recently, the woman’s appeal of the sentence against her has also been filed before the Provincial Court.
