SANTA CRUZ DE TENERIFE, June 24. (EUROPE PRESS) –
The island secretary of the Gran Canaria Canarian Coalition, Pablo Rodríguez, lamented that the Supreme Court had confirmed the nullity of the urban plan for Siam Park and reproached the president of the Cabildo, Antonio Morales, for his “inaction” allowing the “dynamite” of the water park project
“Since the ruling of the Supreme Court was announced in December 2020 regarding the lack of a report on the insufficiency and availability of water resources that the Insular Water Council, a body dependent on the Cabildo de Gran Canaria, should have issued, Antonio Morales has not initiated any action to promote or correct the error made,” said Pablo Rodríguez.
Thus, the nationalist considers that the lack of initiative of the president of the Cabildo “is evident” with the recent ruling of the Supreme Court, and for which he now proposes to process a new Plan for Modernization, Improvement and Increase of Competitiveness in the field of El Veril or declare Siam Park as a project of insular interest; a proposal that for Pablo Rodríguez “arrives at the wrong time, wears out the promoter and becomes a waste of time for the start-up of this water park, of enormous relevance for the island of Gran Canaria and the one with the greatest international relevance”, he added. the.
“Antonio Morales has let the project die to offer a solution that should have been put on the table a year and a half ago,” said Pablo Rodríguez, adding that the “inaction” of the president of the Cabildo is the “general trend” in other strategic investments for Gran Canaria, since “Morales does not have an island project or a strategic plan to promote or attract large investments to Gran Canaria.”
However, Pablo Rodríguez recalled what happened with the El Pajar cement plant, located on land for sports and leisure use, according to the Insular Planning Plan. Even so, indicated the insular secretary of the Canarian Coalition, Antonio Morales “positions himself in favor of the cement company so that it continues to make exclusive use of a public dock, thereby destroying the investment and allowing it to continue in that place even though it is outside the law. and outside the island planning itself”.
